Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Ryan v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10672
Plaintiff:
Sean Ryan and Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bureau of Health Care Services, Heidi Washington and others
Lemke v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lemke and Angel Marie
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Jerome Greenfield, Nichole Francis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Crane et al
as 2:2024cv10539
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Crane, Ulch, Napier and others
(HC)Vasko v. Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
as 1:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Vasko
Respondent:
Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
as 2:2024cv00427
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Vasko
Respondent:
Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Vasko
Defendant:
Amador County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilliard v. State of Iowa
as 2:2023cv01032
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Hilliard
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hilliard v. State of Iowa
as 4:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Hilliard
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchalow Clinton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Puchalow Clinton
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
