Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 23-15755
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, PETER THOMAS COCKCROFT, ERNESTO VENEGAS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor, State of California, JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOE STEPHENSHAW, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Appellee:
MATTHEW A. LOPES, Jr., Special Master
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cowan v. Lilly
as 23-10318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Felix Lyle Cowan
Defendant / Appellee:
Eli Lilly, Pharmecutecal Company, Jack B. Wienstien, Honorable, U.S. Senior District Judge, Settlement Special Master's and Christopher Seegar, Attorney of Seegar Wiess L.L.P (New York)
Powers v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
as 3:2022cv03278
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2017cv02770
Petitioner:
Christopher Darrell Jones
Respondent:
Amanda Kay Branan, The State of Texas and Court 282nd Judicial
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Driver v. U.S. Special Master et al
as 1:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver
Defendant:
U.S. Special Master, Clark Kelso, U.S. Dept. of State Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2010cv00789
Defendant:
Quentin A. Mitchell and Special Masters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Special Masters
as 6:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Quentin A Mitchell
Defendant:
Special Masters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
