Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Duane Montgomery v. United States of America
as 16-6484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE MONTGOMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Keith Henderson v. James Graham
as 15-7260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. GRAHAM, STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, A. BISHOP and others
Keith Henderson v. Shirley Mensch, et al
as 15-11149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY P. MENSCH, MARVIN S. ARRINGTON, SR., ANTHONY BISHOP and others
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 5:2015ct03003
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, Stephen J. Murphy, III, A. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03279
Plaintiff:
Duane Montgomery
Defendant:
United States of America, Wayne County Sheriff's Department, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv01854
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James E. Graham, HuLane E. George, Joy D. Honeycut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 9:2014cv00785
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
James Graham, Bishoplny, Lisa Godbeywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00722
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HENDERSON v. THRASH et al
as 1:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS W THRASH, JR, STEPHEN J MURPHY, III, CAROL COHRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Clark v. Stephen Murphy, et al
as 09-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, JULIE A. BECK, KAREN M. GIBBS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
