Cases 1 - 10 of 50
David Schlemm v. Larry Fuchs, et al
as 23-1873
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. SCHLEMM
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY FUCHS, E. BLOUNT, L. DOEHLING and others
Schlemm, David v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2021cv00331
Defendant:
Jeanie M. Kramer, E. Davidson, Stephen Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Schlemm
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. Murphy et al
as 1:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Adam Robinette, Ripley County Sheriff's Department and Stephen Murphy
Plaintiff:
Edward James Martin O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip Littler v. Blake McDonald, et al
as 18-2471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP M. LITTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE MCDONALD, STEPHEN MURPHY, ISRAEL BREWER and others
LITTLER v. MCDONALD et al
as 2:2016cv00473
Defendant:
ALLAN ADAMS, RYAN BRANDENBURG, ISRAEL BREWER and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP LITTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 3:2016cv00207
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Barksdale Airforce Base et al
as 3:2016cv00206
Defendant:
Barksdale Airforce Base and Camtrak Chemical Emergency
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Kansas City Southern Railway
as 3:2016cv00161
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Kansas City Southern Railroad
as 5:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railroad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Calumet Lubricate
as 5:2016cv00332
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
Calumet Lubricate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
