Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Derwin Jules Jackson v. T.L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Derwin Jules Jackson
Respondent:
T. L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01056
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O C. TAYLOR, C/O J. BOYD and others
Defendant:
LT. T. L. WOODS, LARRY MULLENS, Hearings Officer and WARDEN JEFFREY KISER
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O J. BOYD, C/O J. GILBERT and others
Fejerang v. G. T. L. et al
as 3:2023cv01283
Plaintiff:
Justin Fejerang
Defendant:
G. T. L., Rob Jeffreys and Anthony D. Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
T.L. et al v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
T. L. and C. J.
Defendant:
TERRENCE DICKERSON, TERRELL WILLIAMS, CYNEQUA UNDERWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Montanez v. T.L. Campbell
as 2:2023cv01058
Petitioner:
Paul Montanez
Respondent:
T. L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
