Cases 1 - 10 of 11
John Keller, Jr. v. Gary Allison, et al
as 24-1986
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. KELLER, JR.
Defendant:
GARY ALLISON, TOMMI HAMILTON, GREG MUNDY and others
CLARK v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
CODY LEE CLARK
Defendant:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, DO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
JOSHAWA S. COLLINS
Defendant:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, GARY ALLISON, TOMMI HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLER v. ALLISON et al
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. KELLER
Defendant:
GARY ALLISON, TOMMI HAMILTON, RUSSELL CONRAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitener v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00524
Defendant:
Randy Phelps, Vashti McKinney, Mike Parris and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Whitener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitener v. Parker et al
as 1:2017cv01241
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Whitener
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Marina Cadreche, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitener v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01562
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Whitener
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Marina Cadreche, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. John Sealy Hospital et al
as 3:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Tommy Hamilton
Defendant:
John Sealy Hospital, UTMB, Dr. D. L. Beckles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02604
Petitioner:
Tommy Hamilton
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PASLEY v. WASHINGTON POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2013cv00128
Defendant:
DANIEL CHRISTE, DAVIES COUNTY JAIL, DEPT. OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN PASLEY, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
