Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cox v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Rodger Lee Cox
Defendant:
Deputy J. Spaulding, John R. Spaulding, Logan Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taggart v. D'Amico et al
as 2:2026cv00855
Plaintiff:
George Christopher Taggart and Chris Taggart
Defendant:
Sharon D'Amico, Aimee Griffiths, FNU Durrant and others
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tracy, J. v. Warden of Columbia Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2026cv00942
Plaintiff:
J. Tracy and Jeanine Tracy
Defendant:
Warden of Columbia Correctional Institution and Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. McFadden
as 26-1358
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL TRACY MCFADDEN
IN RE: PETERSON
as 2:2026cv06775
Unknown:
TRACY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Caine
as 1:2026cv00260
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee West
Defendant:
Burl Caine
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keaton Clements v. Anamosa State Prison, et al
as 26-2768
Plaintiff:
Keaton Clements
Defendant:
Anamosa State Prison, Staff, Brian Foster, Warden, Brad Hoenig, Deputy Warden and others
Keaton Clements v. Brian Foster, et al
as 26-2771
Plaintiff:
Keaton Clements
Defendant:
Brian Foster, Warden, Anamosa State Prison (in his individual and official capacity), Mark Krugle, Grievance Officer, Anamosa State Prison (in his individual and official capacity), Josh Baal, Unit Manager, Anamosa State Prison (in his individual and official capacity) and others
Sewell v. Posey et al
as 4:2026cv04201
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Sewell
Defendant:
Erin Posey, Amber Seymour, Lindsay Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
