Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Titus v. White Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
White Castle, Bank of America, Sparks Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Joe D Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Arkansas Department of Human Services, UAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Inman et al
as 4:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Diana D Thomas
Defendant:
Joyce M Johnson, Denese Voss, Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Arkansas Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv00037
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Keith Waddle, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Jeffrey Stieve, Robert Floss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Micah Spence v. Billy Love, et al
as 16-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Micah A. Spence
Defendant - Appellee:
Billy Love, RN, UAMS, Danny Campbell, Medical Staff, UAMS PRI, William Giggleman, Medical Staff, UAMS and others
Brown v. Pulaski County et al
as 4:2015cv00423
Plaintiff:
Gary L Brown
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas, State of, UAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeMay v. UAMS et al
as 4:2014cv00626
Plaintiff:
Devon Heath LeMay
Defendant:
UAMS and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caradine/Assabur v. UAMS Medical Center et al
as 4:2010cv01960
Plaintiff:
William F Caradine/Assabur
Defendant:
UAMS Medical Center and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Norris et al
as 5:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Mims
Defendant:
Larry Norris, James Blackmon, UAMS Eye Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
