Cases 1 - 10 of 3,018
Waldron v. Streeval et al
as 7:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Rondell Waldron
Defendant:
J.C. Streeval, USP Lee, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Felix v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Benjamin Arellano Felix
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
De Mandueno Garcia v. USP Victorville
as 4:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
Felipe De Mandueno Garcia and Carlos Jesus Madueno
Respondent:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
McShan v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jawon McShan
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Quezada v. USP Tucson
as 5:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Graciano Pina Quezada
Defendant:
USP Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Greer v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Andrew Greer
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Daco Zanquello Edwards
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
