Cases 1 - 10 of 100,736
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv00029
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Dana Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
David, Royston v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv23524
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Roystin David and Royston David
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02162
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02163
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02164
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02165
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Battle v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024ct03222
Defendant:
Unicor, United States of America, Factory Manager Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Battle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv01567
Petitioner:
Alvin D. Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00879
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Martinez
as 1:2024cv08200
Defendant:
Miguel Martinez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
