Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. Nelson et al
as 3:2024cv05271
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Nelson, Frank Gilletti, Heather Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stauch (ID 129417) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Letecia Stauch
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus, Donna Hook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre, Dr. Larson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Draper v. Wellpath, LLC et al.
as 4:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Draper
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Nurse Turner, Nurse Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENT v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEON DENT
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, TYLER, ZACK VAN DYKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mike Settle v. Core Civic, Inc., et al
as 22-6062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE SETTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORE CIVIC SOLUTIONS, T.T.C.C., BILLY HOYLE, ASHLEIGH VAN DYKE and others
Castro v. CoreCivic Inc.
as 3:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Mark Castro
Defendant:
CoreCivic Inc., CoreCivic, Inc., Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williford v. Ballard et al
as 2:2022cv00856
Petitioner:
Jonathon Williford
Respondent:
Ben Ballard, Judge Van Dyke and Judge Kelli Calicoate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Settle v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Billy Hoyle, Ashleigh Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
