Cases 1 - 10 of 825
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Cross v. Binns
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Rickey W. Cross
Defendant:
FNU Binns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, OFFICER JACKSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ishman v. Slocumb et al
as 5:2024ct03055
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ishman
Defendant:
Officer Slocumb, Lieutenant Thompson, Captain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haney v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Haney, II
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction, Jacob Winebarger, Burton M. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WHITSETT
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT WHITSETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WHITSETT
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT WHITSETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Deutsch et al
as 5:2023ct03328
Plaintiff:
Darrel R. Fisher
Defendant:
J. Deutsch and W. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
