Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Keaton v. Dolly et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Keaton
Defendant:
Captain Dolly and Warden Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ricky Butler v. Warden Sullivan
as 22-7000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
BUTLER v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Wilson v. Warden, Sullivan Correctional Facility
as 7:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Edgar Wilson
Defendant:
Sullivan County Correctional Facility
Respondent:
Warden, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Correctional Officer Norton et al
as 6:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
Jackie L. Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Norton, Unknown C.O. Doe, Unknown Shift C.O. Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamczyk v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv03291
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul, Warden Sullivan, State of Illinois and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence Adamczyk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Garcia v. Sullivan
as 5:2020hc02059
Respondent:
Warden Sullivan
Petitioner:
Artemio Garcia, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2020cv00280
Defendant:
Sullivan, John Doe, Dr. Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Gill and Tyrone Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Dr. Larson and Warden Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
