Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Warlick v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Derrick Warlick
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Timmy Reichling v. T.J. Fikes, et al
as 22-2366
Petitioner / Appellant:
Timmy J. Reichling
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. Fikes, Warden, Dr. Ann LaValley-Wood, Chief Psychologist, D. Drillings, Correctional Officer and others
Respondent:
Dr. Warlick, Staff Psychologist, R. Zaudkte, Correctional Officer, T. Scullard, Correctional Officer and others
Terry v. Beckwith et al
as 1:2022cv01430
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Terry
Defendant:
Robert Beckwith, Warlick Law Firm PC, The Beckwith Firm LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reichling v. Fikes
as 0:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Timmy J. Reichling
Respondent:
T.J. Fikes, Dr. Lavalley Wood, Dr. Warlick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Lorenzen et al
as 0:2021cv00356
Defendant:
Officer White, Mr. Denzine, J. Fikes and others
Plaintiff:
Javece Lyndale Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2020cv01236
Plaintiff:
Antwoyn Terrell Spencer
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Officer G. White, Captain Warlick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warlick v. Lebo
as 1:2018cv01078
Petitioner:
Charles Warlick
Respondent:
Jonathan Lebo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fisher v. Rogers et al
as 3:2014cv01666
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Fisher
Defendant:
Bradley Rogers, John Perry, Stephen Bigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Warlick v. USA
as 14-10867
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL SHAMBA WARLICK
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Warlick v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv01897
Petitioner:
Samuel Shamba Warlick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
