Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Edward Ferguson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Cantrell Bass, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stutesman v. Karas Health et al
as 5:2022cv05124
Plaintiff:
Harry C. Stutesman
Defendant:
Det. Cody Strange, Det. Levine Garrett, Det. Tommy Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Caffey et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
DeQuincy Smith
Defendant:
Ahmari Caffey, Head, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edrick et al v. Helder, et al
as 5:2022cv05011
Plaintiff:
Edrick Floreal-Wooten, Jeremiah Little, Julio Gonazales and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Helder, Jane or John Does 1 through 10, Karas Correctional Health, P.L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moler v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
Rosemary Stiles, Wooten, Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell/G-Doffee v. Wooten et al
as 5:2019cv00225
Plaintiff:
Don Merceleany R Maxwell/G-Doffee
Defendant:
Melvin J Wooten, J Doe, Falicia A Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Kelley
as 5:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
Adrian Wooten
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Radford v. Brooks et al
as 5:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Vivian Brooks , Erica Johnson , Cindella Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radford v. Brooks et al
as 5:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
V Brooks, Cindella Wooten, Erica Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
