Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burgess v. Barone et al
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
John Burgess
Defendant:
Barone, Lupis, Tawana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jetter v. Shea et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jetter
Defendant:
Kristian Shea, Jean Chaplin, Tawana F and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Catchings et al
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Tawana Catchings, Burl Cain and Donald Jackson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epley v. Luong
as 23-40038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles E. Epley
Defendant / Appellee:
Hien Luong, D.D.S., Dorace L. Bedard, P.M.H.N.P., Wanda T. Hilliard, A.P.R.N. and others
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00166
Petitioner:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, State of Mississippi and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Furtick et al
as 3:2021cv00648
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Tawana Furtick, Cuevas and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolon v. Owens et al
as 5:2021ct03110
Plaintiff:
Ardie D. Nolon and Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
Lerohn Litinchum, Tawana Freeman, Carie Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee et al
as 3:2020cv01119
Defendant:
Tawana Furtique, Lightner, Mazzocca and others
Plaintiff:
David Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
