Cases 61 - 70 of 189
USA v. 28 South Ridge Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut et al
as 3:2018cv00547
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
28 South Ridge Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut
Claimant:
Michael S. Flynn, Maria R. Flynn and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $132,183.44 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX2353 et al
as 2:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$132,183.44 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX2353, $1,019,076.76 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX9249, $40,000.00 from PNC Bank, N.A. Money Market Account No. XXXX9206 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Account Number XXXXX1122, approximately $1,085,385.00 in United States Currency, located at JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 5:2018cv00228
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Account Number XXXXX1122, approximately $1,085,385.00 in United States Currency, located at JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 2040 Solano Way, Oakland, CA et. al.
as 2:2018cv00305
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 2040 Solano Way, Oakland, California, Alameda County, APN: 020-0109-006-3, Real Property located at 925 East 11th Street, Oakland, California, Alameda County, APN: 019-0017-003, Real Property located at 832-836 7th Avenue, Oakland, California, Alameda County, APN: 019-0011-016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v $73.947.35 in United States currency from JP Morgan Chase bank account X1558 in the name of American Info Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00213
Defendant:
$73,947.35 in United States currency from JP Morgan Chase bank account X1558 in the name of American Info Inc , $51,997.87 in United States currency from JP Moran Chase bank account X6975 in the name of American Info Inc , $25,290.00 in United States currency from JP Moran Chase bank account X5478 in the name of Accel International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
United States
Claimant:
United IT Solutions Inc and Sparkpro Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. $64,075.98 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 699730698 et al
as 1:2017cv03013
Defendant:
$64,075.98 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 699730698, $16,286.55 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 538397865, $29,175.00 from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. 532065773 and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. $81,963.74 from American First National Bank Account No. 1050809603 et al
as 1:2017cv02894
Defendant:
$81,963.74 from American First National Bank Account No. 1050809603, All Funds up to $50,000.00 held in Intrust Bank Account No. 99880485, $97,083.00 from Hanmi Bank Account No. 1904739 and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Raza Ahmmed , SGP Trading Inc , Fakhruddin Dean Gheewalla and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. $207,062.20 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2017cv00269
Defendant:
$109,533.88 Seized from American First National Bank and $207,062.20 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. $16,626.97 Held in Bank of the West Account #41502683 et al
as 1:2017cv00751
Defendant:
$16,626.97 Held in Bank of the West Account #41502683, $8,192.22 Held in First Bank Account #2026030437, $50,744.84 Held in First Bank Account #2021245699 and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Currency $14,734.87 From JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. XXXXXX7614 et al
as 2:2017cv10866
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currency $14,734.87 From JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. XXXXXX7614, Currency $4,076.64 From JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. XXXXXX6785 and Currency $6,950.49 From JP Morgan Chase Bank Account No. XXXXX4801
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
