Cases 1 - 10 of 100
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. One Hundred Thirty-Two Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Dollars ($132,330.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2026cv02420
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
One Hundred Thirty-Two Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Dollars ($132,330.00) in United States Currency
Claimant:
David Allen Orellana
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Approximately 127,271 bitcoin (BTC) previously stored at the virtual currency addresses listed in Attachment A, and all proceeds traceable thereto
as 1:2025cv05745
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Fishbeck Claimants
Defendant:
Approximately 127,271 bitcoin (BTC) previously stored at the virtual currency addresses listed in Attachment A, and all proceeds traceable thereto
Claimant:
Zhi Chen, Warp Data Technology Lao Sole Co. Ltd, Ath Leepinyo and others
Interested Party:
Kristen Breitweiser, Caroline Breitweiser, Patricia Ryan and others
Cross-Complainant:
Caroline Breitweiser, Colin Ryan, Patricia Ryan and others
Cross-Defendant:
Approximately 127,271 bitcoin (BTC) previously stored at the virtual currency addresses listed in Attachment A, and all proceeds traceable thereto, Andy Yan, Zhi Chen and others
Counter-Claimant:
Hamen Claimants, Iranian Terrorism Victims, Refael Twersky and others
Counter-Defendant:
Andy Yan, Zhi Chen, Carlos Acosta, as Fiduciary for the Estate of Maria Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $397,040.00 In U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2025cv08963
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
397,040.00 In U.S. Currency, 287,500.00 In U.S. Currency and 103,550.00 In U.S. Currency
Claimant:
E. D. J., Laura LeBaron, J. T. J. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 9.68895 Bitcoin formerly on deposit in Kraken Account No. AA43 N84G W ABM W2VI et al
as 1:2025cv07544
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
9.68895 Bitcoin formerly on deposit in Kraken Account No. AA43 N84G W ABM W2VI and 9.7634005 Bitcoin Cash Formerly on Deposit in Kraken Account No. AA21 AA43 N84G WABM W2VI
Interested Party:
David Gallegos Espejo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL VIRTUAL CURRENCY HELD IN THE BTC-E OPERATING WALLETS AS OF JULY 25, 2017, AND OTHER ASSETS FURTHER DESCRIBED HEREIN
as 1:2025cv02085
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
All Virtual Currency Held in the BTC-e Operating Wallets as of July 25, 2017, and Other Assets Further Described Herein
Claimant:
ARON OPTHUN, SANG RAI KANG, JOSEPH BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Gedamoske et al
as 5:2025cv00818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Gedamoske
Garnishee:
I.B.E.W. Local 1249 Pension Plan and I.B.E.W. Local 1249 Annuity Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
United States of America v. Swisher
as 2:2025cv00274
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Allen Swisher
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
Ulrich v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv00227
Respondent:
United States of America, Ostolski Property Management LLC, Michael Ostolski and others
Petitioner:
David Ulrich
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. $736,040.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2025cv00338
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$736,040.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
David Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Real Property Known as 10801 NW 43rd Street Terrebonne Oregon 97760 et al
as 2:2024cv01890
Defendant:
$3,600.00 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, $24,291.17 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, $8,976.37 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Interested Party:
David K Row
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
