Cases 121 - 130 of 161
DICKERSON et al v. PRINCE TELECOM, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02581
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DICKERSON , WILFREDO ACEVEDO , PEDRO ALICEA and others
Defendant:
PRINCE TELECOM, LLC, OCEAN CABLE GROUP INC. and ROBERT MILLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Juan Achan, et al v. City of Los Angele
as 12-55303
Plaintiff:
JUAN M. ACHAN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY J. ACEVEDO, ANGEL E. ALVAREZ, RANDALL ARAIZA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipal corporation
Juan Achan, et al v. City of Los Angele
as 12-55076
Plaintiff:
JUAN M. ACHAN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY J. ACEVEDO, ANGEL E. ALVAREZ, RANDALL ARAIZA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Lorenzo-Acevedo v. Walgreens Company
as 3:2011cv01912
Plaintiff:
Loriann Lorenzo-Acevedo
Defendant:
Walgreens Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Acevedo et al v. JBS USA, LLC
as 1:2011cv02284
Plaintiff:
Tahys Acevedo and Elisio Guzman
Defendant:
JBS USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acevedo et al v. Imperial Sanitation Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv03336
Plaintiff:
Jose Acevedo, Jose Diaz and Manuel Matute
Defendant:
Steven Franco and Imperial Sanitation Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ACEVEDO v. KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02902
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA ACEVEDO
Defendant:
KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC., KINDRED HOSPITALS EAST, LLC and PEGGY MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Guillen et al v. Hong Kong Bistro, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv02046
Plaintiff:
Cristobal Guillen , Marcelino Sagastume and Maria Acevedo
Defendant:
Hong Kong Bistro, Inc, Fu Lam Mum, Inc, Ben Quan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acevedo v. Local Union 26
as 1:2011cv10656
Plaintiff:
Hector Acevedo
Defendant:
Local Union 26
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
