Cases 11 - 20 of 22
MULLEN v. LILLY USA, LLC, et al
as 1:2015cv02007
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROSE MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Raymond Rodriguez v. Eli Lilly and Company, et al
as 15-20390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ALBERT RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, LILLY USA, L.L.C. and JULIE DAWN RAMOS
Fortuno v. Lilly del Caribe, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01435
Defendant:
Lilly del Caribe, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. (of Puerto Rico), Anthem Life and Disability Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Fortuno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337
HUDSON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2014cv00608
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HAROLD DONALD HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rodriguez v. Eli Lilly And Company et al
as 4:2014cv00968
Plaintiff:
Raymond Albert Rodriguez
Defendant:
Eli Lilly And Company, Lilly USA, LLC and Julia Dawn Ramos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
COBB v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
as 1:2012cv01881
Plaintiff:
NANCY L. COBB
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Baker v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 4:2009cv04915
Plaintiff:
Mark Baker, Mark Baker, Mark Baker and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Stephen Bandak v. Eli Lilly and Company Retirem, et al
as 09-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN I. BANDAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ELI LILLY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY and EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
Stephen Bandak v. Eli Lilly, et al
as 09-1620
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN I. BANDAK
Defendant - Appellant:
ELI LILLY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY and EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
Neal v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 4:2008cv00083
Plaintiff:
Nellie Neal
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
