Cases 11 - 20 of 25
National Labor Relations Board v. Ampersand Publishing, LLC
as 2:2017cv01092
Respondent:
Ampersand Publishing LLC
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Peacock-Holt v. YP LLC, et al.
as 5:2017cv00011
Defendant:
YP LLC and YP Advertising & Publishing LLC
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ivy Peacock-Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fletcher v. Hawk Group Media et al
as 1:2016cv01013
Defendant:
Digital Marketer, LLC and Touchstone Publishing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Danielle Fletcher
HGM:
Hawk Group Media
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jackson v. YP Advertising & Publishing LLC
as 3:2016cv01424
Plaintiff:
Scott D. Jackson
Defendant:
YP Advertising & Publishing LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Cathcart v. YP Advertising & Publishing LLC
as 3:2016cv02084
Plaintiff:
Cathcart and Bronchee Cathcart
Defendant:
YP Advertising & Publishing LLC
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1269 v. YP Advertising and Publishing, LLC
as 3:2016cv00767
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1269
Defendant:
YP Advertising and Publishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
FERNANDEZ v. YP ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING LLC
as 1:2015cv24584
Plaintiff:
MIJAEL FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
YP ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Dinah Griffin et al v. Pennysaver USA, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00854
Plaintiff:
Giancarlo Bresani, Sharon Ciorlieri, Dinah Griffin and others
Defendant:
DOES, OpenGate Capital Group LLC, OpenGate Capital LLC and others
National Labor Relations Board v. Ampersand Publishing, LLC
as 2:2015mc00130
Respondent:
Ampersand Publishing LLC
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board v. Ampersand Publishing, LLC
as 2:2015cv03239
Respondent:
Ampersand Publishing LLC
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
