Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Carlos Morales v. Amazon.com, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01981
Respondent: Amazon.Com LLC and Peach, Inc.
Petitioner: Carlos Morales
INNEO v. THE BLUE PEACH CAFE, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv00608
Plaintiff: STEPHEN INNEO
Defendant: THE BLUE PEACH CAFE, INC. , RAVEN & THE PEACH, INC. , NAUVOO GRILL CLUB, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Peach v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 4:2016cv01947
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff: Felicia Peach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
v. Morales et al
as 3:2016cv06461
Defendant: Carlos Morales, AMAZON.COM, LLC and PEACH, INC. DBA ACTION MESSENGER SERVICE.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morales v. Amazon.com, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv06462
Plaintiff: Carlos Morales
Defendant: Amazon.com, LLC and Peach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peach State Roofing, Inc. v. The Retirement Advantage, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00534
Plaintiff: Peach State Roofing, Inc.
Defendant: The Retirement Advantage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. Peach Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03419
Plaintiff: Lavania White
Defendant: Peach Motors, LLC and Mohammed Adeel Shad
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Cook v. St. Tammany Workforce Solutions, LLC
as 2:2015cv01297
Plaintiff: James Cook , Norvell Williams, IV , Dalton S. Craddock and others
Defendant: St. Tammany Workforce Solutions, LLC and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Cain v. Peach Valley Restaurant Group, LLC
as 6:2014cv01131
Plaintiff: Kendra Cain
Defendant: Peach Valley Restaurant Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Murphy, Jr. v. Peach State Roofing Inc
as 3:2014cv01330
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Murphy, Jr.
Defendant: Peach State Roofing Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?