Cases 21 - 26 of 26
In Re: Boston Scientific
as 08-2568
Plaintiff:
JEFF KLUNKE, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, KIRK HARVEY, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, GEORGE LARSON, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LOWE, Individually, and On behalf of all others similarly situated and DOUGLAS FLETCHER, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Movant - Appellant:
ROBERT HOCHSTADT
Defendant - Appellee:
401(K) PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, RICHARD A. DUFFY, BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
PAUL A. LAVIOLETTE, FREDERICUS A. COLEN, STEPHEN F. MORECI and others
Stuart Long v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 08-2178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STUART LONG
Defendant - Appellant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and DAVID MANESS
Heidi Heineman-Guta v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00605
Plaintiff:
Heidi Heineman-Guta
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Long v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
Stuart Long
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and David Maness
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Trombetta v. Guidant Corporation Change in Control Severance Pay Plan for Employees et al
as 5:2007cv00393
Plaintiff:
Patrick M. Trombetta
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation Change in Control Severance Pay Plan for Employees, Guidant Sales Corporation, Guidant Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Masters v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv03792
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan
Plaintiff:
Donald Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
