Cases 21 - 30 of 155
Martinez v. China King Corporation
as 1:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
German Martinez
Defendant:
China King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Du v. Dingxiang Inc et al
as 1:2019cv11924
Defendant:
Yiming Wang, Cafe China Group LLC, Xian Zhang and others
Plaintiff:
Mei Rong Du
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mateo et al v. TA HSIN, INC. (d/b/a Great China) et al
as 7:2019cv00419
Defendant:
Heng-Rung Tseng, Shou Chuan Tseng and TA HSIN, INC. (d/b/a Great China)
Plaintiff:
Francisco Mateo and Maria Medina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Bassel v. Bank of China et al
as 1:2019cv06836
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jamie Bassel and Dr. Jamie Bassel, D.C.
Defendant:
Bank of China and Aetna Life and Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
He v. China New Star Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05907
Defendant:
Wai Shun Chan, Wai Wen Chan, China New Star Restaurant, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Yong Xiong He
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez v. China City of East 188th Street Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09115
Defendant:
China City of East 188th Street Inc., Youyi He and Xiao Ying Huang
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lo v. China Airlines, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv00335
Plaintiff:
Chu Shu Lo
Defendant:
Hung Chang Chou, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Poot et al v. East China, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Plaintiff:
Gaudencio Poot, Manuel Yam and Daniel Puch
Defendant:
East China II, Inc., East China, Inc., Jinhua Liang and others
YANG v. TASTE OF NORTH CHINA, LTD et al
as 2:2019cv09392
Defendant:
TASTE OF NORTH CHINA, LTD, NEW TASTE OF NORTH CHINA INC., QIMIN CAI and others
Plaintiff:
Baoyu Yang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
R Alexander Acosta v. China Palace, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00594
Defendant:
Miao Hui Zhang, Jian Zhang and China Palace, Inc.
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
