Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Washburn v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00214
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc. and GMRI, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frank Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Claudia Garcia v. GMRI Inc et al
as 2:2012cv04806
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants Inc, Does and GMRI Inc
Plaintiff:
Claudia Garcia
Antonio Romo et al v. GMRI Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00715
Plaintiff:
Claudia Garcia, Jonathan Macias and Antonio Romo
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants Inc, Richard Demarzo, Does 1 through 10 inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lyons v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
David E. Lyons, Jr.
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones et al v. Capital Grille Holdings, Inc. d/b/a The Capital Grille, GMRI, Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00660
Plaintiff:
Keith Jones , Jared Cropps , Josephine Ogbenna and others
Defendant:
Capital Grille Holdings, Inc., GMRI, Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Pediatric Special Care Inc v. Darden Restaurant Group Life and Health Plan for Salaried Employees et al
as 2:2010cv13313
Plaintiff:
Pediatric Special Care Inc
Defendant:
Darden Restaurant Group Life and Health Plan for Salaried Employees Sponsored by Darden Restaurants Inc and United Medical Resources (UMR)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Bertram v. Darden Restaurants Inc.
as 1:2009cv03982
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bertram and Shawn Bertram
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Coffey v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 1:2007cv00554
Plaintiff:
Lesa Coffey and Lesa Coffey
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and Darden Restaurants, Inc. Long Term Disability Benefits
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
