Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Kyle v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01030
Defendant:
The United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Michigan Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Corwin Kyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2020cv00428
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ruiz et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02643
Plaintiff:
Steve Ruiz and Adam Morehead
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Dean Williams and David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOLLAND v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2020cv05687
Plaintiff:
Scott Holland
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Robinson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2020cv01680
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wyman v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2020cv00462
Plaintiff:
Emily Wyman
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Fulton et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv00144
Defendant:
New York City Department of Correction and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Katrina Fulton and Darnell Walcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ELLIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
Nicole P. Ellis and NICOLE P ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
Thercy v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv21822
Plaintiff:
Vivian Thercy
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Thercy et al
as 1:2019cv21821
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Vivian Thercy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
