Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint
as 1:2021cv02346
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint
Defendant:
Narasab Ali and Sky Heights Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Baker v. City of Richmond Heights
as 1:2021cv00856
Defendant:
City of Richmond Heights
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Zepeda Ochoa v. Famous Pizza of Jackson Heights Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01604
Plaintiff:
Abel Noel Zepeda Ochoa
Defendant:
Famous Pizza of Jackson Heights Corp. doing business as Elmhurst Famous Pizza, Louis Antonio and Elmhurst Famous Pizza Corp. doing business as Elmhurst Famous Pizza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
1199 SEIU United Healthcare Wo v. PSC Community Services
as 21-633
Respondent:
AccentCare of NY, Inc., The First Chinese Presbyterian Community Affairs Home Attendant Corp., Richmond Home Needs and others
Petitioner:
1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East
Intervenor:
Maria Diaz, Epifania Hichez, Seferina Acosta and others
1199 SEIU United Healthcare Wo v. PSC Community Services
as 21-631
Respondent:
AccentCare of NY, Inc., The First Chinese Presbyterian Community Affairs Home Attendant Corp., Richmond Home Needs and others
Petitioner:
1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East
Appellant:
Leticia Panama Rivas, Eugenia Barahona Alvarado, Elida Augustina Mejia Herrera and others
Intervenor:
Maria Diaz, Epifania Hichez, Seferina Acosta and others
Respondent / Appellee:
United Jewish Council of the East Side Home Attendant Service Corp.
The Discovery House, LLC et al v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company et al
as 8:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
The Discovery House, LLC, DHP Heights, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Circle of Hope, MT Process LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Divine Detox and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross of California, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, The Anthem Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Discovery House, LLC et al v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv02330
Plaintiff:
THE DISCOVERY HOUSE, LLC, MT PROCESS LLC, dba DIVINE DETOX, MT GOLDEN CORPORATION, dba ADJUSTMENTS FAMILY SERVICES and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross of California, The Anthem Companies, Inc., The Anthem Companies Of California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Beavers v. Cahaba Heights Plaza LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cody Beavers
Defendant:
Mohammed Dawoud and Cahaba Heights Plaza LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. Prestige Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Homewoods Heights, LLC and Prestige Care, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dawn Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Bay Park Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC et. al. v. Philipson et. al.
as 2:2020cv06291
Defendant:
Donna Hodge, Annette Hall, Karen Grant Williams and Alexi Arias, Deborah Philipson, Avi Philipson and others
Plaintiff:
Bay Park Center for Nursing & Re abilitation LLC d/b/a Bay Park Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC, Brookhaven Rehabilitation & Heath Care Center LLC d/b/a Brookhaven Rehabilitation & Health Care Center LLC,, South Point Plaza Nursing and Rehabilitation Center doing business as Bayview Manor LLC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation, and Oriska Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
Home Attendant Services of Hyde Park, New Carlton Rehab & Nursing Center, Prokeep Inc. and others
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
