Cases 31 - 40 of 622
Lawrence et al v. Benesys, Inc.
as 2:2022cv11517
Plaintiff:
Heather Lawrence, Kathy Campau and Laura Pettis-Clark
Defendant:
Benesys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Oriska Corporation v. Troy Operating Co. LLC
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Troy Operating Co. LLC, (Diamond) Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC, Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appearClass Defendant, Annette Hall, Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Kathy Allen v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
as 22-1528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHY R. ALLEN and JAY K. ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
METLIFE, MERCER HEALTH BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION, LLC and LINCOLN HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE CO.
GREEN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
KATHY KAY GREEN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hotchkiss v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv02392
Plaintiff:
Kathy E. Hotchkiss
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Talbott v. Sokoly et al
as 8:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Melinda Talbott
Defendant:
Kathy Sokoly Chelst, Thomas David Sokoly, Estate of Annamarie Sokoly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Labor Standards Act
Malabasco v. Sokoly et al
as 8:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Grace Malabasco
Defendant:
Thomas David Sokoly, Kathy Sokoly Chelst, Estate of AnnaMarie Sokoly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Labor Standards Act
Drew-King v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2022cv01479
Petitioner:
Kathy Drew-King
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Make the Road New York
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
