Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Karlin v. MCS Mortgage Bankers, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv06011
Plaintiff:
Peter Karlin
Defendant:
David Kotkin, MCS Mortgage Bankers, Inc., Stephen Petuck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Watts v. Silverton Mortgage Specialists, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03574
Plaintiff:
Elaine Watts
Defendant:
Silverton Mortgage Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Rapp et al v. Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
William Rapp and Larry Eggett
Defendant:
Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Almanza v. Defendant Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv21030
Plaintiff:
Loida Almanza
Defendant:
Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc. and Alex Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Hollon v. Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00828
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hollon
Defendant:
Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Oakes et al v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Winfield Oakes , Pete Johnson and David Steele
Defendant:
Dennis M Fisher and Rapid Mortgage Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
THOMAS v. MORTGAGE NOW, INC.
as 3:2015cv05018
Plaintiff:
KURTIA THOMAS
Defendant:
MORTGAGE NOW, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Norris v. Union Mortgage Group, Inc.
as 8:2014cv02792
Plaintiff:
Thomas Norris
Defendant:
Union Mortgage Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wooley et al v. Bridgeview Bank Mortgage Company, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02234
Plaintiff:
David Wooley , Brian Leonard and Dana Self
Defendant:
Bridgeview Bank Mortgage Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Louis Alvarez v. Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc. et al.
as 8:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
Louis Alvarez
Defendant:
Does and Federal National Mortgage Association Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
