Cases 31 - 40 of 7,070
Central States Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Contreras et al
as 3:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Central States Health & Welfare Fund and Charles A Whobrey
Defendant:
Mercedes Contreras, Samantha Sanford and Norma Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Connecticut Pipe Trades Local 777 Health and Welfare Fund et al
as 3:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Connecticut Pipe Trades Local 777 Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Connecticut Pipe Trades Local 777 Annuity Fund, Trustees of the Connecticut State Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Southport Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds v. Dame Contracting, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03454
Respondent:
Dame Contracting, Inc. and Dame Contracting
Petitioner:
Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. DYKSTRA CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, CO.
as 1:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
DYKSTRA CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Pension Fund et al v. Carrier Building Services
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Annuity Fund, Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union NO. 74 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Carrier Building Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Pension Fund et al v. Highliners Barnecue Enterprises Corp et al
as 5:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Pension Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Annuity Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 1249 Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
Highliners Barnecue Enterprises Corp doing business as Hotwire Line Construction and Randy E. Dearing Individually and as an Officer of Highliners Barbecue Enterprises Corp doing business as Hotwire Line Construction
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund et al v. Summit Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Annuity Fund, Board of trustess, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Summit Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds v. Aguina Brothers Contracting LLC
as 2:2024cv02624
Petitioner:
Trustees of the North Atlantic States Carpenters Health, Pension, Annuity, Apprenticeship, and Labor Management Cooperation Funds
Respondent:
Aguina Brothers Contracting LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nelson v. Toro et al
as 8:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Donte Nelson, Sr.
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro, The United States Department of the Navy and U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Espinal v. All-State Construction and Restoration LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Jordan Espinal
Defendant:
All-State Construction and Restoration LLC and Robert DeCosey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
