Cases 41 - 50 of 147
McGrann v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Thomas McGrann
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC and Keith Ng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Todd, et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 5:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Citronella Todd and Dawn Cause
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Atkins et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 2:2015cv12416
Plaintiff:
Joseph Atkins , Tim Bondurant , Justin Roach and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Foster v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC -
as 4:2015cv00101
Defendant:
Latasha Nicole Foster and AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Foster v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 5:2015cv00256
Defendant:
Latasha Nicole Foster and AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Alexander et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03161
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alexander and Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Alexander et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03165
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Plaintiff:
Greg Alexander and Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wilkinson v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 3:2015cv04976
Plaintiff:
Kerry Ann Wilkinson
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Kelsey v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
as 3:2015cv01352
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Erika M. Kelsey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Repass v. AT&T Services Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02686
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc, AT&T Mobility Services LLC and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Plaintiff:
Susan M Repass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
