Cases 51 - 60 of 233
Lawson vs Urban Outfitters, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02912
Defendant:
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lawson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lawson v. Sals Towing, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv61070
Plaintiff:
Beth Lawson
Defendant:
Sals Towing, Inc. and Salvatore Bellassai
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Lawson v. Procare CRS, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Deborah L Lawson , Queshnia Lashau Ackerson , Karissa Eileen Allen and others
Defendant:
ProCare CRS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raef Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 18-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAEF LAWSON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, and in his capacity as Private Attorney General Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
GRUBHUB, INC. and GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.
Acosta v. RPG Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
RPG Enterprises, LLC, Ryan Gutman and Owen Lawson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lawson v. Clean City, LTD. et al
as 1:2018cv00579
Plaintiff:
Charity Lawson
Defendant:
Clean City, LTD. and Cornelius L. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Lawson v. UNUM Life Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Janice Lawson
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lawson v. Time Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv03461
Plaintiff:
Rhonda F Lawson
Defendant:
Time Insurance Company and Assurant Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lawson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 7:2017cv02886
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lawson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ADAMS et al v. WAUPACA FOUNDRY
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS, JARED AHL, ERIC ALDERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
WILLIAM CARWILE, JR.
Defendant:
WAUPACA FOUNDRY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
