Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 889
Directors of the Ohio Conference of Plasterers and Cement Masons Combined Funds, Inc Vs Omni Fireproofing Co.,LLC
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff: DIRECTORS OF THE OHIO CONFERENCE OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS COMBINED FUNDS, INC. and TRUSTEES OF THE PLASTERERS LOCAL NO. 1 PENSION PLAN
Defendant: OMNI FIREPROOFING CO., LLC and Omni Fireproofing Co.,LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Louis Salvucci v. The Glenmede Corp, et al
as 23-1542
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOUIS D. SALVUCCI, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Carla Marie Salvucci
Defendant / Appellee: THE GLENMEDE CORP and THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GLENMEDE CORP
Katherine Belcastro-Gonzalez v. City of Omaha, et al
as 23-1553
Plaintiff / Appellee: Katherine Belcastro-Gonzalez
Defendant / Appellant: City of Omaha and Todd Schmaderer, Chief of Police of the Omaha Police Department, in his official Capacity
Defendant: Jean Stothert, Mayor of the City of Omaha and Tim Young, Former Human Relations Director for the City of Omaha, in his official and individual capacity
Lenai Mull, et al v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, et al
as 23-55143
Plaintiff: LENAI MULL, DANIELLE MULL, appointed Guardian Ad Litem for Carson Mull, CARSON MULL and others
Counter Claimant: MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN and BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Superior Air Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00907
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 206 Health Benefit Trust and others
Defendant: Superior Air Inc, Vinod Jothilingam and Vandana Ahuja
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Fitzpatrick et al v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: Linda A. Fitzpatrick, Michael W. Peters and Mary E. Becklun
Defendant: Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc., The Board of Directors of Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc., Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. Participant Directed Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Nathan P. Goldstein v. Tavares, LLC
as 1:2023cv10137
Plaintiff: Nathan P. Goldstein, as he is Executive Director, Massachusetts Laborers' Benefit Funds and Nathan P. Goldstein
Defendant: Tavares, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. Emmett Furla Films Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff: Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan
Defendant: Emmett Furla Films Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Georgia Film Fund Seven Productions, LLC, a Louisiana Limited Liability Company, Georgia Film Fund Seventeen, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Directors Guild of America - Producer Health Plan et al v. Thousand Foot Squid, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Directors Guild of America - Producer Health Plan and Trustees of the Directors Guild of America - Producer Pension Plans
Defendant: Thousand Foot Squid, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Joseph Campbell v. Board of Directors of Bryn Mawr Trust Co, et al
as 23-1034
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOSEPH CAMPBELL
Defendant: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST CO, DIEGO F. CALDERIN, MICHAEL J. CLEMENT and others
Defendant / Appellant: ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?