Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Roland et al v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv11586
Plaintiff:
Frederic Roland and Jose Antonio Ramos Lima
Defendant:
Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation and Cardinal Home Delivery Carriers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carachure Santamaria, et al. v. Virginia Agricultural Growers Association, Inc., et al.
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Carachure Santamaria and Cesar Antonio Ramos Jaime
Defendant:
Virginia Agricultural Growers Association, Inc., Baskerville Farms, Inc. and Dusty Road Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ramos v. Florida Drawbridges, Inc
as 9:2021cv80844
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ramos
Defendant:
Laura Porter, Eric Obel and Florida Drawbridges Inc doing business as FDI Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
RAMOS MARIN et al v. MEZZECANTINA LLC et al
as 3:2017cv05020
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RAMOS MARIN and ARTURO LOPEZ
Defendant:
MEZZECANTINA LLC and MICHAEL KRIKORIAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cegueda et al v. Atlas Network, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00967
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Cegueda , Eric Lopez , Humberto Dolores and others
Defendant:
Ali Chahine, Kerim Antoine Kfuri, Atlas Network, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ibarra et al v. Builder Services Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
Juan Martin Carreras Ibarra , Amado Cortes Castro , Angel Cota and others
Defendant:
Builder Services Group, Inc. , Masco Services Group Corp. , Masco Contractor Services, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendoza et al v. Essential Quality Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06117
Plaintiff:
Mario Mendoza, Mario Mendoza, Alexis Cruz and others
Defendant:
Essential Quality Construction, Inc., Harris Builders, L.L.C., Hanover Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
