Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Pavon v. ClarkDietrich Engineering Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rojas Pavon
Defendant:
ClarkDietrich Engineering Services, LLC and Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family Medical Leave Act
Dietrich v. C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04871
Defendant:
C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Taryn Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martin v. Sprint LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Frank Martin
Defendant:
Sprint LLC, T Mobile and Devin Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Martin v. Sprint LLC et al
as 2:2023at00389
Plaintiff:
Frank Martin
Defendant:
Sprint LLC, T Mobile, Devin Dietrich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DEMARCO et al v. FARMACEUTICALRX, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DEMARCO, CLINT GOODENOW, MARK WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
FARMACEUTICALRX, LLC, FRX MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, FRX GROWTH PARTNERS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Troy Operating Co. LLC
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Troy Operating Co. LLC, (Diamond) Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC, Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appearClass Defendant, Annette Hall, Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Hodge et al
as 1:2021cv01999
Defendant:
Mr. Benjamin Landa, Roberta Reardon, Steven Topal and others
Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
