Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sydney Keefe v. Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc., et al
as 24-11252
Plaintiff:
SYDNEY MARIE KEEFE
Defendant:
BRITT'S BOW WOW BOUTIQUE, INC. and MERRI COLVARD
Sydney Keefe v. Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc., et al
as 23-14024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SYDNEY MARIE KEEFE
Defendant / Appellant:
BRITT'S BOW WOW BOUTIQUE, INC. and MERRI COLVARD
Keefe v. Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc et al
as 0:2022cv62138
Counter Defendant:
Sydney Marie Keefe
Defendant:
Britts Bow Wow Boutique, Inc and Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc
Counter Claimant:
Merri Colvard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Keefe v. Perry's Restaurants LTD et al
as 1:2021cv01057
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Keefe
Defendant:
Perry's Restaurants LTD, Christopher V Perry and Perry's Restaurants LTD doing business as Perry's Steakhouse and Grille
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Keefe v. LendUs, LLC
as 1:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
Quentin Keefe
Defendant:
LendUs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'Keefe v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2018cv01344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey O'Keefe
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Wood v. Ethoplex LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01385
Defendant:
Ethoplex LLC and Keefe John
Plaintiff:
Brandyn Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KEEFE v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
as 3:2015cv06807
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. KEEFE
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hernandez et al v. UBS AG et al
as 1:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Edith Hernandez and Ana O'Keefe
Defendant:
UBS AG and UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Clark et al v. Sedberry et al
as 3:2014cv03034
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Clark , Denise Hartnett and James O'Keefe
Defendant:
John V Sedberry, Kimberley A Tobin and Sedberry-Tobin Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
