Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 99,743
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff: Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant: Little Sandy Correctional Complex and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee v. Rardin
as 2:2024cv11154
Petitioner: James C. McKee
Respondent: Eric Rardin
Cobb #370530 v. Rambus
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff: Chris Cobb #370530
Defendant: Unknown Rambus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer #529310 v. Ensing et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff: Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant: Matthew Ensing, Margaret Greiner, Brian Majerszyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner: Maurice Freeman
Respondent: Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff: James A. Babeneau
Defendant: Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamarces Watson v. Brian Eller
as 24-5425
Petitioner: JAMARCES JAJUAN WATSON
Respondent: BRIAN ELLER, Warden
Clarence Jenkins, Jr. v. Sherman Campbell
as 24-1382
Petitioner: CLARENCE REED JENKINS, JR.
Respondent: SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
Keith Pippins, Jr. v. Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
as 24-3374
Petitioner: KEITH J. PIPPINS, JR.
Respondent: WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Anthony McKinney v. Denise Paddock, et al
as 24-3375
Plaintiff: ANTHONY L. MCKINNEY
Defendant: DENISE PADDOCK, Librarian c/o at LOCI, in their individual and official capacity, LIEUTENANT R. KAMMER, at LOCI in their individual and official capacity, LIEUTENANT SHAWN FRYE, at LOCI in their individual and official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?