Cases 91 - 100 of 280
Sides v. Riley et al
as 5:2013cv01815
Petitioner:
Lynda Alma Sides
Respondent:
Jack C Riley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bottoms v. Russell County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Bottoms
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Dr. Warr, Ms. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
James Edward Spencer
Respondent:
Robert Bentley, Bob Riley, Don Siegelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KTK Mining of Virginia, LLC v. City of Selma, Alabama et al
as 2:2012cv00655
Plaintiff:
KTK Mining of Virginia, LLC
Defendant:
City of Selma, Alabama and William T. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drullat v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Mario Robertino Drullat
Defendant:
Nurse Riley, Dr. Warr, Lt. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rounsavall et al v. Ametek, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv02785
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Rounsavall and Opal Rounsavall
Defendant:
Ametek, Inc., BASF Catalyst LLC , Champlain Cable Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moon v. Russell County Jail (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
James Charley Moon
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Riley Pelfrey and Doctor Warr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Clyde E Jones, Brandon K Falls, Anne Marie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
