Cases 91 - 100 of 748
Catlett et al v. Eck & Glass Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Adam Catlett and Josh Bartlett
Defendant:
Eck & Glass Inc and Cummins Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Rettstatt v. Golden et al
as 4:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
William Rettstatt
Defendant:
Miller County Correctional Center, Warden Jeffie Walker, Sergeant Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Charlie Irvin
Defendant:
Adams, Baker and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Timothy Adam Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Stanley v. Grey et al
as 4:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Eric Romar Stanley
Defendant:
Corporal Grey, Officer Smith, Officer Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Marbley et al
as 4:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cortez Hudson
Defendant:
Tina Marbley, CoreCivic West Tennessee Detention and Marrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv04035
Plaintiff:
Eric Demond Russell
Defendant:
Captain Adams, Sergeant Golden, Correctional Officer Mrs. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonds v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv04034
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Reid Bonds
Defendant:
Captain Golden Adams, Steven King, Nurse Chelsea Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Paige, III, Thomas Hearst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurdsman v. USA
as 4:2022cv00312
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
