Cases 91 - 100 of 267
Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00843
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Alexander
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ALEXANDER v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2020cv00506
Defendant:
JERRY HOOKS, LUKE GREER, KEVIN FIRESTONE and others
Plaintiff:
MATS STEFAN ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUFF et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv02435
Plaintiff:
Adam Huff and Laura Hope Huff
Defendant:
MAEQUANDA DONALDSON, Jayia Alexander, Terry Stigdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUDERDALE-EL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN SMOOTHERY and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. DICKERSON et al
as 2:2020cv00430
Plaintiff:
JOE HOWARD MCCLAIN
Defendant:
JUDY PYNE, DENNIS ALEXANDER, MELODEE SUE DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01835
Plaintiff:
DAVID OWENS
Defendant:
TODD NEAL, DORA ALLERNA, TYLEAH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v BARNES
as 2:2020cv00180
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER, SR.
Defendant:
BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2020cv00179
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH, LIEBEL, I. RANDOLPH and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ALEXANDER, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOSEPH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00986
Defendant:
TIFFANY LYNN CLARK, BOONE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and BART FERRARO
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER C. JOSEPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. DICKERSON et al
as 2:2020cv00105
Defendant:
MELODEE SUE DICKERSON, DENNIS ALEXANDER, BECK and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HOWARD MCCLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
