Cases 91 - 100 of 218
Hall v State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2013cv00609
Petitioner:
Alexander B Hall
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tompkins et al v. Executive Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention et al
as 1:2013cv00840
Plaintiff:
L. Kirk Tompkins and Susie Tompkins
Defendant:
Executive Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention , Southern Baptist Convention , Lifeway Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention and others
Movant:
Sheehan & Sheehan, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Nick Hall
as 13-30219
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NICK B. HALL
COLEY v. HALL
as 1:2013cv00484
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WAYNE COLEY
Respondent:
JOSEPH B. HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bullock v. Hall
as 5:2013hc02110
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamont Bullock
Respondent:
Joseph B. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nickerson v. Hall et al
as 5:2013ct03105
Plaintiff:
Lindo Nickerson
Defendant:
Joseph B. Hall and Linwood Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faison v. Hall
as 5:2013hc02104
Petitioner:
Moses Leon Faison
Respondent:
Joseph B. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nickerson v. Hall
as 5:2013hc02105
Petitioner:
Lindo Nickerson
Respondent:
Joseph B. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Hall
as 5:2013hc02088
Petitioner:
Cassius R. Jones
Respondent:
Joseph B. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Bishop, et al v. Texas Dept of Public Safety, et al
as 13-20189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY BISHOP, CYNTHIA BISHOP, DEBORAH CLARK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF COLLEY, STEVEN C. MCCRAW, GREG PEKAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
