Cases 91 - 100 of 190
George Durham v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-3605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE M. DURHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
William Vukich v. Commonwealth of Beaver County, et al
as 17-2885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF BEAVER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
WHITE v. BEAVER COUNTY
as 2:2017cv00998
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WHITE
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Terel Dixon v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEREL DARNELL DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
DEEM v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH DEEM
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, JENNIFER MONZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOECHER v. DELON et al
as 2:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KOECHER
Defendant:
BRANDON GARY DELON, COUNTY OF BEAVER, PENNSYLVANIA, PRISON BOARD OF BEAVER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VUKICH v. COMMONWEALTH BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00441
Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH BEAVER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Vukich v. Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 17-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Defendant - Appellee:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Beaver County, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
In re: Gary Robinson
as 17-1648
Petitioner:
In re: GARY ROBINSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
THORNTON v. BEAVER COUNTY CYS et al
as 2:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THORNTON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY CYS, NICOLE DICICCO, DAVID REESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
