Cases 91 - 100 of 168
Albert Heitzmann v. Charles Ryan
as 11-17999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT KARL HEITZMANN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, Department of Corrections
Erin Proctor v. Director, Dept. of Correction
as 11-7317
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIN DEAN PROCTOR
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Warees Muzakkir v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-17225
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAREES IBN MUZAKKIR
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director Department of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Benjamin Fawley v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN WILLIAM FAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections, LARRY HUFFMAN, Western Regional Director, R.C. MATHENA, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Defendant:
OTHER JANE AND JOHN DOE OFFICIALS AND STAFF
Yusef Sykes v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7098
Petitioner - Appellant:
YUSEF HASSAN SYKES
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harris v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 3:2011cv00325
Petitioner:
Dextram L. Harris
Respondent:
Director, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Denory Bell v. Director Department of Correct
as 11-6574
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENORY A. BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gus Lanier v. Director, Department of Correc, et al
as 11-11961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUS LANIER
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER, COUNTY MANAGER and others
Richard Swiney v. Ms. Badgett
as 11-6556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE SWINEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. BADGETT
Defendant:
KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden, BURNETTE, Ms.; Grievance Coordinator, GENE JOHNSON, Director Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.