Cases 91 - 100 of 295
Matlock et al v. En - Vision Home Solutions LLC
as 3:2020cv00684
Plaintiff:
Grant Matlock and Stephanie Matlock
Defendant:
En - Vision Home Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. Georgetown, City of et al
as 2:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Ricky Martin, Sheldon A Butts, Rudolph A Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. US Department of Defense
as 8:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant
Defendant:
US Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant-Davis v. Felker et al
as 4:2019cv03468
Defendant:
Thomas E. Uhde, MD, Frampton McLeod Gwynette, MD, P. Steven Rublee and others
Plaintiff:
King Grant-Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Larlee v. Browne
as 1:2019cv03147
Plaintiff:
Grant W. Larlee
Defendant:
Cynthia A. Browne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Manigault v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance et al
as 2:2019cv03113
Defendant:
Laquanda D Grant and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Plaintiff:
Delvaris Manigault
Not Yet Classified:
State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant-Davis v. Mikell et al
as 2:2019cv03119
Defendant:
Jason Mikell, Charleston, City of, Stephen Harris and others
Plaintiff:
King Grant-Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Browne v. Larlee Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02862
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Larlee Construction, LLC
Respondent:
Grant Larlee
Petitioner:
Dr. Cynthia Browne
3Rd Party Defendant:
Quality Concrete Finishing of Aiken, Inc. and B&K Grading and Paving, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
