Cases 91 - 100 of 178
Phillips v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv01336
Petitioner:
Charles A Phillips
Respondent:
Eric Holder , Isaac Fulwood and B.A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murphy v. Fulwood
as 0:2011cv01723
Petitioner:
Thomas Murphy
Respondent:
Isaac Fulwood and Mary Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01182
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. FULWOOD
as 1:2011cv01167
Petitioner:
THOMAS MURPHY
Respondent:
ISAAC FULWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gary deWilliams v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-5122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary deWilliams, (NMN)
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General, and his Successor, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman and his Successor, in their Official and Personal Capacities and United States Parole Commission
JONES et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv00935
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDRE JONES and THEODORE WRENN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie Wilson v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 11-5119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddie Wilson
Defendant - Appellee:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnett Cobb v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.
as 11-6445
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARNETT COBB
Respondent - Appellee:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., Chair, US PAROLE COMMISSION, SCOTT KUBIK, Hearing Examiner, U.S. Parole Commission and others
GAMBRELL et al v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2011cv00626
Plaintiff:
JAMES GAMBRELL , KENNETH C. EASTON , TALIB M. SHAKIR and others
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. , CRANSTON J. MITCHELL , PATRICA K. CUSHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
