Cases 91 - 100 of 295
HAN et al v. WEMAKEPRICE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07077
Defendant:
WEMAKEPRICE INC. , I-SHOPLOG HOLDINGS INC. , I-SHOPLOG LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HEUNG JOO HAN and JONG MIN KOH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Almond v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Sharon Almond
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Ted Sakai , State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCIANDRA v. BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD et al
as 2:2017cv06469
Plaintiff:
LOIS SCIANDRA
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD, LARRY MINDA, PAUL CECE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Seals v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05789
Plaintiff:
Tyrek Seals
Defendant:
The City of New York, Isaias Colon, UC # 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc.
as 17-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mei Xing Yu, individual, on behalf of all other employees similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
Hasaki Restaurant, Inc., Shuji Yagi, Kunitsugu Nakata and others
White v. Eddins et al
as 1:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Justin M White
Defendant:
William Eddins , Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC and John and/or Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Park v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Hyun Ju Park
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, Anson Kimura, Sterling Naki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis et al. v. Sarar USA Inc. et al.
as 1:2017cv02181
Plaintiff:
Connell Lewis , Amber Werst , Susan Capps and others
Defendant:
Sarar USA Inc. , Tufan Aksahin , Bulent Kurtyilmaz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Slaton et al v. Does 1-10
as 1:2017cv01025
Plaintiff:
Jack Middleton , Southern Motor Carriers Association, Inc. and Danny Slaton
Defendant:
John and/ or Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
