Cases 91 - 100 of 1,061
Clark v. Doe
as 5:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Clark
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knott v. Cyclone Drilling Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Preston Knott
Defendant:
Cyclone Drilling Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Knight v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knight
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, John Scully, Brent Sugg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
It v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Anthony K It, Anthony Nkefiah and Anthony Bryant
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Little Axe County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Hammond
Defendant:
Little Axe County Sheriff's Department, Christopher Amason and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harding v. Grisham et al
as 6:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Harding
Defendant:
William L Grisham, Love County Board of County Commissioners, Jeff Mullinax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Topkov v. Grubb et al
as 5:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alexander Topkov
Defendant:
Allan Grubb, John Doe, Lincoln County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hulse v. Team Next Level, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00546
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hulse
Defendant:
Team Next Level, Inc., John Hall, II, Doe Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WBL SPO I, LLC v. Bowen et al
as 4:2021cv00532
Plaintiff:
WBL SPO I, LLC
Defendant:
Brandy Janeal Bowen an individual doing business as Spruce Up, Kathy Bowling, Becky Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
