Cases 91 - 100 of 264
Miller et al v. Doe et al
as 4:2019cv00402
Plaintiff:
Steve R. Miller and Penny Miller
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., John Doe and Ames Iowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04082
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Guzman Mendez v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv00381
Petitioner:
Lucio Arturo Guzman Mendez
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Department of, Matthew Ablence, John Asmussen and others
Respondent:
Chad Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jaye v. USA, et al--PER #3 ORDER PLAINTIFF AUTHORIZED TO EMAIL HIS PLEADINGS
as 1:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Mary Melfi, William Barr, Robert E Kirschman and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooks v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2019cv00340
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Kim Reynolds, Alan Ostergren and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jose Cooks
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheri Johnson, et al v. John Doe, et al
as 4:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Jane Doe, William McCarthy, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sheri Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Parker v. Dubuque, City of et al
as 2:2019cv01020
Defendant:
David Randall, Wendy Lyons, Kelly Francois and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weems v. Officer John Doe et al
as 4:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and City of Muscatine
Interested Party:
Muscatine County Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Weems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. City of Burlington, Iowa et al
as 4:2019cv00186
Plaintiff:
Dale Dexter Morrow, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe and City of Burlington, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
