Cases 91 - 100 of 1,471
Buffalo River Watershed Alliance v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2023cv03012
Plaintiff:
Buffalo River Watershed Alliance
Defendant:
United States Forest Service and Timothy E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lion/Jones v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
DaShotta/Datran Lion/Jones
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Christopher Johnson and Tyrone Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Howard Memorial Hospital
as 4:2023cv04010
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jones
Defendant:
Howard Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moss v. Carpenter et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Amanda Moss
Defendant:
Caden Zane Carpenter, Anne Hicks, Kathy Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Williams v. Hollowell et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Darrell K Williams
Defendant:
Tyler R Hollowell, Cleveland Jones, William F Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Marshall et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dewon Jones
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Susan Duffell, Matt Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Cyrano Jones
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Markise Jones
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Gilliam, Jennifer Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowman
as 4:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
Diane Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McNealy v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Bradley McNealy
Defendant:
McFadden, Daniels, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
