Cases 91 - 100 of 110
HARGETT v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01316
Defendant:
DAVID CLARK, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., MICHELLE L. HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. HARGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eddie Vaughans v. Michael Mitcheff
as 11-3116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE VAUGHANS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF
ESTATE OF JAMES BOWMAN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00869
Defendant:
DR. ELTON AMOS, M.D., DR. RICHARD M. CARR, M.D., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JAMES BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jester v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jester
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services , Zimont, Michael Mitcheff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Buss et al
as 3:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
Ken-ya Wright
Defendant:
Ed Buss , Mark Levenhagen , Dr Michael Mitcheff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zuniga v. Buss et al
as 2:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Laurentino Zuniga
Defendant:
Ed Buss, Mark Levenhagen and Dr Michael Mitcheff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Bowman v. Edwin Buss, et al
as 09-4139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. BOWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWIN G. BUSS, BRETT MIZE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and others
FOX v. MITCHEFF et al
as 1:2009cv01102
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FOX and RICHARD FOX
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, CARY JOHNSON and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughans v. Nelson et al
as 3:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
Eddie Vaughans
Defendant:
Dawn Nelson, Mark Levenhagan, Rose Vausvukas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turcsik v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Turcsik
Defendant:
Dr Michael Mitcheff, Barbara Brubaker, Dr John Israel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
